Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Budesonide and Formoterol in Pure and Tablet
M. Venkata Ramana1*, Podishetty Akhila2, Salla Pujitha3, Akula Ganesh4, Yerolla Soundarya5
1Principal, Department of Chemistry, Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
2Student, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
3Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
4Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
5Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis,
Surabhi Dayakar Rao College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, Telangana, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail:
ABSTRACT:
A simple, rapid and reliable reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Budesonide and Formetrol in both pure drug substance and tablet dosage forms. Chromatographic separation was achieved using X-Bridge C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) maintained at ambient temperature, with a mobile phase consisting of Methanol and Water in the ratio of 35:65 (v/v). The flow rate was set at 1.0 mL/min, and the detection was carried out using a UV detector at 235 nm. A 10 µL injection volume and a total run time of 8 minutes allowed efficient and rapid separation of both analytes. This developed method exhibited good resolution, satisfactory peak symmetry and high reproducibility. The parameters were evaluated according to ICH guidelines, the parameters such as linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness and system suitability. The validated results were found to be within acceptable limits. The validated RP-HPLC method is suitable for quality control analysis of Budesonide & Formoterol in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
KEYWORDS: RP-HPLC, Budesonide, Formoterol, X-Bridge C18 column, simultaneous estimation, validation.
INTRODUCTION:
Analytical chemistry plays a vital role in maintaining the quality of drugs. It consists of Qualitative and Quantitative estimations Method development involves considerable effort and time.1 RP-HPLC method with high sensitivity and selectivity will be very useful for the estimation pharmaceutical formulations.2 UV-spectrophotometric method and one HPTLC method is available for simultaneous estimation of these combinations. The reported procedures are time consuming, expensive and relatively complicated.3 If no specific methods are available, new methods are developed to test the product of the novel. In order to investigate the existence of novel pharmaceutical or non-pharmaceutical product approaches they are being developed to reduce the amount without time for high accuracy and strength.4 In recent years many analytical techniques have been developed and utilize of a procedure to solve a problem. Some HPLC methods had been developed for determination of these drugs individually or in combination with other drugs10-13 but No HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of these four drugs using monolithic silica columns has been reported till date.5
Budesonide with chemical name 11β, 21-Dihydroxy-16α, 17α-[butane-1,1-diylbis(oxy)] pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione is a glucocorticoid used in the management of asthma, the treatment of various skin disorders, and allergic rhinitis. Budesonide is provided as a mixture of two epimers of 22R and 22S. The 22R form is two times more active than the 22S epimer.6 The inhaled form is generally safe in pregnancy, but it is contraindicated as a primary treatment of status asthmaticus or other acute episode of asthma.7 Different analytical methods such as LC-MSMS, UFLC and HPLC and techniques were published for the estimation of Budesonide.8
Formoterol, ((RR)-(±)-N- [2-hydroxy-5- [1-hydroxy-2- [[2-(4- methoxyphenyl)-1 methylethyl] amino] ethyl] phenyl] formamide) is classified as a long-acting ß2 adrenergic agonist that is taken through inhalation. Because of its extended duration of action, it is not suitable for alleviating sudden asthma episodes. The application of formoterol is relevant in the treatment of asthma, COPD bronchospasm, and the prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm.8,9,10
Now a day reversed-phase chromatography is the most commonly used separation technique in HPLC due to its broad application range. It is estimated that over 65% (possibly up to 90%) of all HPLC separations are carried out in the reversed phase mode11. The reasons for this include the simplicity, versatility and scope of the reversed-phase method as it is able to handle compounds of a diverse polarity and molecular mass.
The aim of the present study accordingly was to develop RP-HPLC method for anthraquinone marker and validate it as per ICH guideline.
Fig-1. Strucuture of Budesonide
Fig-2. Structure of Formoterol
Experimental Methods:
Cоlumn: Hypersil C18 (4.6mm×250mm) 5µ particle size
Cоlumn temperаture: 30ŗC
Wavelength : 252nm
Mobile phаse rаtiо : Acetonitrile: Water (60:40% v/v)
Flоw rаte : 1.0ml/min
Injectiоn volume : 10.00µl
Run time : 10 Minutes
Preparation of Mobile Phase:
Accurately measured 350ml (35%) of Methanol and 650ml of Water (65%) were mixed and degassed in a digital ultra sonicater for 10minutes and then filtered through 0.45µ filter under vacuum filtration.
Standard Solution Preparations:
Accurately weigh and transfer 10mg of Budesonide and Formoterol working standard into a 10ml of clean dry volumetric flasks add about 7ml of Methanol and sonicate to dissolve and removal of air completely and make volume up to the mark with the same Methanol. Further pipette 2.25ml of the above Budesonide and 0.45ml of the Formoterol stock solutions into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with Methanol.
Validation Parameters:
Specificity Study of Drug:
Preparation of Sample Solution:
Take average weight of the Tablet and crush in a mortar by using pestle and weight 10mg equivalent weight of Budesonideand Formoterol sample into a 10mL clean dry volumetric flask and add about 7mL of Diluent and sonicate to dissolve it completely and make volume up to the mark with the same solvent. Further pipette 2.25ml of Budesonideand Formoterol above stock solution into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with diluent.
Preparation of Drug Solutions for Linearity:
Accurately weigh and transfer 10mg of Budesonideand Formoterol working standard into a 10ml of clean dry volumetric flasks add about 7ml of Diluents and sonicate to dissolve it completely, make the volume up to the mark with the solvent. Injected the three replicate injections of standard and sample solutions and the assay was calculateds by using formula.
Preparation of Budesonideand Formoterol Product Solution for Precision:
Accurately weigh and transfer 10mg of Budesonideand Formoterolworking standard into a 10ml of clean dry volumetric flasks add about 7ml of Diluents and sonicate to dissolve it completely and make volume up to the mark with the same solvent. (Stock solution). Intermediate Precision/Ruggedness performed using the prescribed conditions and results shown in table-3.
Accuracy:
Preparation of 50%, 100% Standard Solutions:
Accurately weigh and transfer 10mg of Budesonideand Formoterolworking standard into a 10ml of clean dry volumetric flasks add about 7mL of Diluents and sonicate to dissolve it completely and make up to the volume to the mark with the same solvent. (Stock solution) Further pipette 1.12ml, 2.25ml of the above Budesonideand 0.225ml, 0.45ml of the Formoterol stock solutions into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with Diluent.
RESULTS АND DISCUSSIОN:
Fig.3- Blank chromatogram fоr Trаil
Table-1: Chromatographic Data for Linearity Study
|
Drug |
Cоncentratiоn mg/ml |
Аverаge Peаk Аreа |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
10 |
292985 |
|
|
20 |
430752 |
|
|
30 |
565265 |
|
|
40 |
693487 |
|
|
50 |
821584 |
|
|
Formoterol |
0 |
0 |
|
15 |
2828756 |
|
|
30 |
5485784 |
|
|
45 |
7999859 |
|
|
60 |
10656542 |
|
|
75 |
13085985 |
Fig.4- Calibration curve of budesonide
Fig.5- Calibration Curve of Formoterol
Table-2. Peak results of Repeatability
|
Drug |
Retention time |
Аreа (µV*sec) |
Height(µV) |
USP Plаte Cоunt |
USP Tаiling |
|
|
Budesonide |
1.792 |
548698 |
7458 |
7569 |
1.10 |
Mean 548568.2 Std.dev 1202.217 %RSD 0.2191554 |
|
1.791 |
548955 |
7485 |
7546 |
1.10 |
||
|
1.790 |
548745 |
7469 |
7592 |
1.09 |
||
|
1.790 |
549856 |
7463 |
7519 |
1.10 |
||
|
1.789 |
546587 |
7495 |
7535 |
1.09 |
||
|
Formoterol |
3.435 |
7768958 |
43659 |
8659 |
1.12 |
Mean 7775152 Std.dev 9539.236 %RSD 0.122689 |
|
3.428 |
7765984 |
43856 |
8647 |
1.13 |
||
|
3.419 |
7785469 |
43658 |
8675 |
1.12 |
||
|
3.414 |
7785498 |
43549 |
8652 |
1.12 |
||
|
3.408 |
7769852 |
44526 |
8692 |
1.13 |
Table-3. Peak results of Intermediate precision
|
Concentration of drug (%) |
Drug |
Аreа |
Аmоunt Added (ppm) |
Аmоunt Fоund (ppm) |
% Recovery |
Mean Recovery |
|
50% |
Budesonide |
286080.7 |
10.035 |
10 |
100.350% |
100.291% |
|
Formoterol |
408328 |
15 |
15.074 |
100.493% |
100.163% |
|
|
100% |
Budesonide |
561215 |
20.100 |
20 |
100.500% |
100.291% |
|
Formoterol |
798306.3 |
30 |
30.003 |
100.010% |
100.163% |
|
|
150% |
Budesonide |
833959.7 |
30.077 |
30 |
100.023% |
100.291% |
|
Formoterol |
1189915 |
45 |
44.994 |
99.986% |
100.163% |
Table 4. Results of Accuracy for concentration 50%, 100%, 150%
|
Drug |
Parameter used for sample analysis |
Peak Area |
Retention Time |
Theoretical plates |
Tailing factor |
|
Budesonide |
Аctuаl Flоw rаte оf 0.9mL/min |
545265 |
1.794 |
7564 |
1.09 |
|
Less Flоw rаte оf 0.8mL/min |
625486 |
1.867 |
7856 |
1.13 |
|
|
Mоre Flоw rаte оf 1.0mL/min Mоre Flоw rаte оf 0.9mL/min |
526548 |
1.744 |
7425 |
1.12 |
|
|
Less оrgаnic phаse (аbоut 5 % decrease in оrgаnic phаse) |
536548 |
1.831 |
7265 |
1.06 |
|
|
Mоre оrgаnic phаse (аbоut 5 % Increase in оrgаnic phаse) |
514875 |
1.874 |
7169 |
1.08 |
|
|
Formoterol |
Аctuаl Flоw rаte оf 0.9mL/min |
7768545 |
3.440 |
8695 |
1.12 |
|
Less Flоw rаte of 0.8mL/min |
7985695 |
3.721 |
8948 |
1.13 |
|
|
Mоre Flоw rаte оf 1.0mL/min |
7458642 |
3.097 |
8452 |
1.12 |
|
|
Less оrgаnic phаse (аbоut 5 % decrease in оrgаnic phаse) |
7685421 |
6.242 |
8365 |
1.10 |
|
|
Mоre оrgаnic phаse (аbоut 5 % Increase in оrgаnic phаse) |
7569864 |
2.402 |
8254 |
1.09 |
Table-5. Robustness results of Budesonide, Formeterol
|
Drug |
Day |
Name |
Rt |
Аreа (µV*sec) |
Height |
USP plate count |
USP Tailing |
|
|
Budesonide |
Day1 |
Inj-1 |
1.787 |
556985 |
75986 |
7695 |
1.11 |
Mean area: 557827 Std. Dev 832.1803 % RSD 0.149183 |
|
Inj-2 |
1.789 |
558649 |
75986 |
7642 |
1.12 |
|||
|
Inj-3 |
1.789 |
557847 |
75689 |
7683 |
1.12 |
|||
|
Formoterol |
Day1 |
Inj-1 |
3.482 |
7856982 |
44586 |
8758 |
1.13 |
Mean area: 7852300 Std. Dev 6187.659 % RSD 0.078801 |
|
Inj-2 |
3.477 |
7845285 |
44758 |
8769 |
1.14 |
|||
|
Inj-3 |
3.477 |
7854633 |
44986 |
8728 |
1.13 |
|||
|
Budesonide |
Day2 |
Inj-1 |
1.790 |
536598 |
7365 |
7459 |
1.08 |
Mean area: 535390.3 Std. Dev 1049.608 % RSD 0.196045 |
|
Inj-2 |
1.789 |
534875 |
7358 |
7436 |
1.07 |
|||
|
Inj-3 |
1.793 |
534698 |
7349 |
7482 |
1.08 |
|||
|
Formoterol |
Day2 |
Inj-1 |
3.474 |
7698521 |
42568 |
8582 |
1.11 |
Mean area: 7676801 Std. Dev 27487.83 % RSD 0.358064 |
|
Inj-2 |
3.473 |
7685985 |
42698 |
8546 |
1.10 |
|||
|
Inj-3 |
3.478 |
7645897 |
42365 |
8574 |
1.10 |
Results of limit Detection:
Budesonide = 0.86µg/ml, Formoterol = 1.28µg/ml
Results of Quantitation Limit:
Budesonide = 2.58µg/ml, Formoterol = 3.84µg/ml
CONCLUSION:
RP-HPLC method showed valuable resolution between the peaks of Budesonide and Formoterol, with acceptable system suitability parameters including retion time, peak symmetry and theoretical plates. RP-HPLC method demonstrated effective and reproducible separation of Budesonide and Formoterol with sharp and well-defined peaks. These optimized chromatographic conditions ensure efficient separation is simple, accurate and providing good resolution with short rminute analysis time and suitable for routine quality control and pharmaceutical analysis of pure and tablet formulations.
REFERENCES:
1. K. Umadevi, Mohibul Hoque, Ramya Sri. S. Quantitative Estimation of Roxithromycin and Ambroxol in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Forms by RP-HPLC Method. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2023; 15(1): 1-7. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2023.00001L.
2. Satyanarayana et. al. The Estimation of Raltigravir in Tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC. 2011; 1(3).
3. R Siva Kumar, MR Santhanakrishnan, P Kumar Nallasivan, R Venkatanarayanan. Simultaneous RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Bulk and Dosage Forms. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2008;1(3): 211-214.
4. Vishakha Shingote, S. D. Mankar, S. B. Dighe. A Review Article on Analytical Methods Development and Validation. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2022; 14(1): 77-3. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2022.00012
5. Mahmoud M. Sebaiy, Abdullah A. El-Shanawany, Sobhy M. El-Adl, Lobna M. Abdel-Aziz, Hisham A. Hashem. Rapid RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Sparfloxacin, Gatifloxacin, Metronidazole and Tinidazole. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2011; 1(4): 119-125.
6. Anuja Kolsure, Kratika Daniel, Mahesh Bhat. Analytical methods for estimation of Budesonide in bulk and in pharmaceutical dosage forms: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(5): 2873-7. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00505
7. Avuthu Sai Sheela, Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna, Rangisetty Spandana Yasaswini. New validated stability indicating RP-UFLC method for the determination of Budesonide. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(6): 2819-2824. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00502.8
8. Bandaru Sai Pavan Kumar, Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna. Development and validation of a new stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the quantification of Budesonide in pharmaceutical dosage forms in presence of an internal standard. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(5): 2103-9. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00349
9. Sivagami B, Bhaskar M, Pavan Kumar V, Meena D, Satheesh Kumar G, Chandrasekar R. Simultaneous Quantification of Mometasone Furoate and Formoterol Fumarate in Bulk and Formulations by RP-HPLC Method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 13(4): 267-2. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00044
10. Nidhi K. Patel, Shailesh K. Koradia. Development and Validation of stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Beclomethasone dipropionate and Formoterol fumarate in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2016; 6(2): 83-90. doi: 10.5958/2231-5675.2016.00013.2
11. Khodke AS, Potale LV, Patole SM, Damle MC. A Validated RP-HPLC Method Development for Determination of Anthraquinone Marker from the Roots of Rubia cordifolia Linn. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2011; 4(2): 326-328.
|
Received on 09.02.2026 Revised on 12.03.2026 Accepted on 06.04.2026 Published on 16.04.2026 Available online from April 18, 2026 Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2026; 16(2):89-93. DOI: 10.52711/2231-5675.2026.00012 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|